Slush Impact Report Series — Startup Report 2026

Slush startups raise more, bigger and better rounds

A matched benchmark study of 2k Slush startups against 230k European peers.
Executive summary

Slush companies outperform on every metric measured

The fundraising premium
3.5×
VC fundraising rate vs. matched European peers after attending Slush
The cap table premium
7.0×
More likely to be backed by a top-0.1% global VC fund
Growth velocity
2.5×
Funding stage graduation rate vs. matched European peers

Slush is the largest gathering of venture capital in Europe, held in Helsinki each November. The question this report asks is simple: do the companies that attend go on to outperform comparable peers? The study matches 2,108 first-time attendees from 2022, 2023, and 2024 against 229,866 European peers on stage, country, and founding year. Across fundraising, investor quality, and growth, the answer is the same.

Attendees raised institutional capital at 3.5× the rate of matched European peers. The premium holds in all three cohorts and every region tested. Among the 48% who turned up without prior backing, the post-event VC rate runs at 3.1× that of bootstrapped peers, a measurable catalyst on the path to first institutional capital.

The fund-quality gap is wider than the fundraising gap. Attendees are 7.0× more likely than peers to land a top-0.1% global VC, twice the headline premium. Cheques run larger, too: among funded companies, the median Slush round is 2.1× the size of a comparable peer round. The cross-border signal moves in both directions. European attendees gained a US investor at 5× the rate of peers; the ~135 US-domiciled attendees gained a European investor at 8× the rate of comparable US peers.

The pattern extends past capital. The cohort advances at least one funding stage at 2.5× the rate of peers, grows headcount faster (61% vs 49% of those with measurable data), and picks up non-dilutive grants at 3.4× (24% vs 7%). The direction is identical across every operational measure. The findings are correlational: matching controls for stage, geography, and founding year, but causality cannot be proven from observational data alone.

Pressed for time? The full dataset, methodology, and caveats are also available as a plain-text file, readable by humans and LLMs alike.

Who attends Slush?
2 years
Median age at first attendance (2022–2024 cohorts)
~90%
Early stage (bootstrapped through seed) at first attendance
3 in 4
From outside Finland; the event draws from across Europe and beyond
48%
Arrived bootstrapped, with no institutional backing before attending

Each November, Helsinki turns into one of the world's most concentrated early-stage venues. Thousands of founders, investors, and ecosystem players converge for three days of programming, meetings, and chance encounters. Half the startups in the room are pre-institutional: no VC round, no lead investor, just a product and a plane ticket. Median company age at first attendance is two years. Slush is built for exactly that moment, before the term sheet, before the proof, before the world is paying attention.

The investor side of the room is equally dense. More than 2,000 investors attend each year, from seed angels and regional VCs to partners at top-tier global funds and multi-stage growth shops. Corporate venture arms, accelerators, media, and ecosystem builders fill out the rest. It is one of the few venues where a zero-revenue founder and a partner at a top-10 global fund stand in the same building for three days, with no gatekeeping in between.

Slush is, at its core, a bet on Europe. European tech has spent a decade building on its own terms: deep technical talent, founder-first capital, and a growing cluster of breakout companies that have earned their place on any global stage. This report is Slush Research's attempt to put numbers to that conviction. What it shows is that founders who invest in their network, who show up, who put themselves in the room, go on to raise more, from better investors, and grow faster than peers who don't.

Full breakdown in Methodology.

The fundraising premium

The fundraising premium is real, consistent, and largest for bootstrapped companies

Fundraising is the single most-cited bottleneck for early-stage European founders, named as the top struggle by nearly 60% of respondents in Slush's 2025 Startup Struggle survey. Attending Slush is strongly associated with closing that gap.

Attendees raise institutional capital at 3.5× the rate of comparable European peers: 26.4% against 7.5%. The figure is drawn from 2,108 first-time attendees in the 2022, 2023, and 2024 cohorts, benchmarked against 229,866 European peers matched on founding year, country, and growth stage. The premium holds in every cohort and every region tested.

The mix of starting positions explains the headline. The 2,108 attendees split nearly evenly into companies with no institutional capital at attendance (1,009, or 48%) and those already backed (1,099, or 52%). That balance is unusual: in the European benchmark, 89% of companies are bootstrapped. Among bootstrapped attendees, the post-event VC rate is 17%, against 5.6% for bootstrapped peers, a 3.1× premium. Among already-backed attendees, the follow-on rate is 35% against 23.2%.

First cheque, twice the premium
Post-event VC fundraising rate, by starting position
Slush companies European peers
Post-event VC rate · Dealroom, Slush analysis
Three cohorts, one pattern
Post-event VC fundraising rate, by first attendance year
Slush Peers
Post-event VC rate (%) by first attendance year

The aggregate 3.5× exceeds either subgroup multiple because Slush draws disproportionately from already-backed companies, who post higher fundraising rates in both populations. Both numbers are accurate; the 3.1× is the figure that speaks most directly to bootstrapped founders.

The premium is broad. It holds in every cohort, every European region, and every industry cluster measured. Early-stage companies outperform peers at 3.5×; breakout-stage companies at 1.8×. The association is positive across every segment analyzed.

It is not only frequency that shifts; deal size moves too. Among companies that raised post-event, the median Slush round was roughly twice the size of a comparable peer round. Measured on funded companies only, the figure should be read alongside the rate, not instead of it.

Rounds run 2× larger at the median
Median post-event round size, USD millions (funded companies only)
Median round size · funded companies only · USD M
The cap table premium

It is not just whether you raise. It is who you raise from.

Attendees are 7.0× more likely than matched European peers to be backed by a top-0.1% global VC (ranked by Dealroom's global investor index; see Methodology). The headline fundraising premium is 3.5×. The fund-quality premium is twice that. Slush companies are not just raising more often; they are raising from better funds, at a proportionally higher rate than the fundraising premium alone would predict.

Fund tier (Dealroom global rank) Slush Peers Premium
Top 0.1%5.60%0.80%7.00×
Top 1%17.30%2.80%6.10×
Top 2.5%24.30%4.20%5.80×
Top 10%36.00%7.10%5.10×

The premium widens as the tier narrows. A uniform lift across the ecosystem would produce flat ratios; instead, the ratio climbs from 5.1× at the top decile to 7.0× at the top 0.1%. The Slush cohort is not randomly distributed across the VC quality spectrum; it is concentrated toward the upper end of it.

Climbing the tiers
Share backed by investor tier, 2022–2024 cohorts
Slush Peers
% backed by investor tier · Dealroom global rank · 2022–2024
Steeper at the top
Slush-to-peer ratio by Dealroom global rank tier
Premium (×) vs matched European peers · Dealroom global rank

Cross-border reach moves in step. European attendees are 5× more likely than peers to have a US investor on the cap table: 22.2% against 4.5%. The pattern runs the other way too. Roughly 135 US-domiciled companies attended over the study period, tracked separately from the 2,108-company analysis; 37% of them picked up a European investor, against 4.6% of US peers, an 8× gap. The direction of causality cannot be settled from this data alone.

Cross-border reach, 5× higher
Share with a cross-border investor post-event, 2022–2024
Slush Peers
% with cross-border investor post-event · 2022–2024

Post-event acquisition rates anchor the timing precisely: each round dates after first attendance, and each investor is new to the cap table. On that basis, 28.9% of attendees added a new investor; 7.0% added a US investor; 12.2% added a top-10% global VC; and 4.4% added a top-1% global VC.

New names on the cap table
Share of Slush companies acquiring a new investor after first attendance
% of Slush companies (n=2,108) · post-first-attendance
Growth velocity

The premium extends beyond fundraising

Raising capital is not the only thing the cohort does faster. The premium shows up in stage progression, team growth, and non-dilutive funding, and it does so across all three cohorts.

Attendees advance at least one funding stage at 2.5× the rate of peers. 13.7% of the cohort moved up at least one stage (bootstrapped to seed, seed to early VC, early to growth) against 5.4% of peers. The graduation premium is widest at the bootstrapped layer: 3.7× in the 2022 cohort, which has three full years of post-event data and is the most mature reference point. The 2023 and 2024 cohorts show higher apparent premiums (4.2× and 5.7×), but shorter observation windows depress their benchmark comparisons; the figures are expected to converge as the data matures. In every cohort, the multiple narrows as the starting stage rises. The pattern mirrors the fundraising premium: the lift is largest where the starting position is lowest.

The graduation premium appears early and persists across all three cohorts.
Bootstrapped → First VC Round
Seed / Angel → Early VC

Team growth follows the same pattern. 61% of attendees with measurable headcount data grew their teams in the observation window, against 49% of peers, a 1.2× premium. The signal is directional: Dealroom employee data is available for roughly 70% of companies in the population, and the comparison rests on the subset with non-zero values at both endpoints.

Headcount up in the majority
Share with headcount growth post-event (companies with Dealroom employee data)
Slush Peers
% with headcount growth post-event · companies with Dealroom employee data only

Non-dilutive funding compounds the picture. 24% of attendees received a grant or support-program allocation post-event, against 7% of peers, a 3.4× premium. Grants are tracked separately from VC to avoid conflating dilutive and non-dilutive capital. For deep tech, climate, and research-intensive companies, non-dilutive funding typically runs alongside equity, not in place of it.

The non-dilutive edge, 3.4× higher
Share receiving grant or support-program funding post-event, 2022–2024
Slush Peers
% receiving grant or support-program allocation post-event · 2022–2024

Slush is designed to offer early-stage founders the opportunity for life-changing connections and inspiration, to show that the world's best can be, and is being, built from Europe. The Slush Impact Report is the first indication of the impact Slush can have on a startup's trajectory.

Slush 2026 takes place in Helsinki this November. Applications for the next cohort are open at slush.org. The data suggests the flight is worth taking.

Methodology

What was measured, and how

The analysis covers 2,108 European companies that attended Slush for the first time in 2022, 2023, or 2024, founded 2016 or later and pre-Series B at first attendance. The benchmark is 229,866 Dealroom-tracked European companies of the same vintage and stage, matched on founding year, country, and growth stage. For Slush companies, the observation window opens the day after first attendance; for benchmark peers, it covers the equivalent post-2022 period.

The 2,108 companies are drawn from a paid-ticket universe of 4,501 unique companies across Europe and the US over the 2022–2025 events (de-duplicated to first attendance year per company). Europe-only, 2022–2024 cohorts, founded 2016 or later, and pre-Series B filters reduce that universe to the analysis population.

The 2025 cohort is excluded. Six months of post-event data is not enough to register the rounds that will eventually appear; the measured rate is artificially low. The 2025 cohort enters the analysis in the 2027 edition.

The study is observational, not causal. Matching controls for founding year, geography, and growth stage. It cannot control for the ambition, network, or fundraising-readiness of companies that choose to attend. The premium reflects a combination of who attends and what attending does; the data cannot separate the two.

The statistics below describe the 4,501 unique companies that held a paid ticket to Slush in 2022–2025 (EU and US). The 2,108-company analysis population is a subset: Europe-only, first-time attendees in 2022–2024, founded 2016 or later, and pre-Series B at first attendance.

StagenShare
Bootstrapped / No prior VC1,00947.9%
Seed / Angel~630~29.9%
Early VC~469~22.2%
CohortMedian agen
20222.0 yrs1,076
20232.0 yrs864
20242.0 yrs868
70.6% were 0–3 years old
IndustryShare
Enterprise SW13.2%
Fintech9.1%
AI7.1%
Health7.0%
Climate4.9%
CountryShare
Finland28.6%
Germany14.1%
United Kingdom13.2%
Sweden9.5%
Estonia4.2%
Method Share Count
Exact name64.5%2,904
Website domain10.6%478
Dealroom URL slug0.8%37
Fuzzy confirmed0.6%26
No match23.2%1,044

VC rounds counted: Seed, Angel, Early VC, Series A–H, Growth Equity VC, Late VC, Convertible, Private Placement VC. Grants and support programs are excluded from VC counts and tracked separately. Acquisitions, IPOs, debt, spinouts, and post-IPO rounds are excluded from both.

Funding stage hierarchy (Dealroom classification, used throughout the report and graduation heatmaps):

Bootstrapped / No prior VC—no institutional VC round on record at the time of first Slush attendance. This is a point-in-time classification: a company that raises a Seed round after attending is still counted as bootstrapped at attendance.

Seed / Angel—at least one Seed or Angel round on record at time of first attendance; no Early VC or later stage round yet. The graduation heatmap tracks how many of these companies subsequently reach Early VC.

Early VC—Dealroom's designation for the first institutional lead round, roughly equivalent to a Series A. Covers round types labeled Early VC and Series A in Dealroom. The bootstrapped heatmap panel counts any qualifying VC round (including Seed) as graduation; the Seed/Angel panel uses only Early VC and Series A as the graduation event.

Growth / Late VC—Series B and above, including Growth Equity VC and Late VC round types. Companies already at this stage at first attendance are excluded from the graduation heatmaps but included in all other analyses.

Investor tier ranking (Dealroom power law)—Dealroom assigns a global rank to approximately 40,000 investors based on deal activity, portfolio quality, and exits. For each company, the analysis uses the best rank: the rank of its single highest-ranked investor across all qualifying post-attendance rounds. Tier thresholds are defined as percentages of this ranked universe:

  • Top 0.1%—rank ≤ 40
  • Top 1%—rank ≤ 400
  • Top 2.5%—rank ≤ 1,000
  • Top 10%—rank ≤ 4,000

Approximately 24.5% of Dealroom-tracked investors hold a power-law rank. Companies whose cap tables contain only unranked investors are excluded from tier comparisons; their fundraising activity is captured in the overall backing rate but not attributed to any tier.

Dealroom coverage is stronger in Western Europe. That dampens both Slush and benchmark figures in Central and Eastern Europe.

Investor enrichment data is partial. AUM covers 6.5% of investors; the power-law rank covers the top 40,000 funds globally (about 24.5% of tracked investors).

Survivorship bias applies to both sides. Dealroom under-represents failed companies, which may inflate absolute fundraising rates on both sides but should not materially affect the ratios.

Stage-graduation time anchors differ between cohorts and benchmark. For Slush companies, quarters are measured from November 1 of the attendance year: Q4 for the 2022 cohort reaches November 2023; Q4 for the 2023 cohort reaches November 2024. The benchmark is a single pool anchored to November 1, 2022; every benchmark company's Q1–Q12 starts there, regardless of when it was founded or last raised. A 2023 or 2024 Slush row and the benchmark row therefore cover different calendar windows. The design measures relative pace, not performance within a shared calendar period.


This is the first edition of a longitudinal study. The 2022 cohort has three full years of post-event data; the 2023 and 2024 cohorts will show higher rates as the data matures. The 2025 cohort enters the analysis in the 2027 edition.

Appendix

Data notes

Population counts for every number, chart, and comparison in this report.

GroupnNotes
Slush companies (analysis population)2,108European companies · first attendance 2022, 2023, or 2024 · founded 2016 or later · pre-Series B at time of first attendance
European benchmark229,866Dealroom-tracked European companies matched to the Slush population on founding year, country, and growth stage
Paid-ticket universe (all years, EU + US)4,501Unique companies with paid tickets across 2022–2025 events, de-duplicated to first attendance year per company; before applying Europe-only, 2016+ founding, and pre-Series B filters
CohortSlush nBenchmark nNotes
2022809227,758Observation window opens 1 Nov 2022 · up to 3 years of post-event data available · benchmark is the same shared pool for all three cohorts
2023667227,758Observation window opens 1 Nov 2023 · up to 2 years of post-event data available
2024632227,758Observation window opens 1 Nov 2024 · up to 1 year of post-event data available
Chart / metricSlush nBenchmark nNotes
Overall post-event VC rate (26.40% vs 7.50%)2,108229,866% that raised at least one qualifying VC round after first attendance; round types: Seed, Angel, Early VC, Series A–H, Growth Equity VC, Late VC, Convertible, Private Placement VC; grants and debt excluded
Bootstrapped at attendance (17.00% vs 5.60%)1,009204,925No institutional VC round on record before first Slush attendance; same round-type scope as overall rate
Already VC-backed at attendance (35.00% vs 23.20%)1,09924,941At least one VC round on record before first Slush attendance; same round-type scope
2022 cohort rate (32.80% vs 7.20%)809227,758% raised within the 2022 cohort's observation window; benchmark uses the same shared pool observed from Nov 2022
2023 cohort rate (26.80% vs 4.90%)667227,758% raised within the 2023 cohort's observation window; benchmark observed from Nov 2022 (see methodology caveat)
2024 cohort rate (17.90% vs 2.80%)632227,758% raised within the 2024 cohort's observation window; benchmark observed from Nov 2022 (see methodology caveat)
Median round size, funded companies only ($3.8M vs $1.8M)55717,163Restricted to companies with at least one qualifying post-event VC round; round size as reported in Dealroom at time of extraction
Chart / metricSlush backed nBenchmark backed nNotes
Top 0.1% fund (5.60% vs 0.80% · 7.00×)1181,817At least one investor with Dealroom global rank ≤ 40 on post-event cap table; rank covers ~40,000 funds globally
Top 1% fund (17.30% vs 2.80% · 6.10×)3646,408At least one investor with Dealroom global rank ≤ 400
Top 2.5% fund (24.30% vs 4.20% · 5.80×)5129,535At least one investor with Dealroom global rank ≤ 1,000
Top 10% fund (36.00% vs 7.10% · 5.10×)75916,200At least one investor with Dealroom global rank ≤ 4,000
Post-event investor acquisitionSlush n (rate)Notes
Any new investor (28.90%)2,108Investor must be new to the company's cap table and the qualifying round must be dated after first Slush attendance; all investor types included
New Top 10% VC (12.20%)2,108Investor new to cap table; Dealroom global rank ≤ 4,000 (Top 10% of ~40,000 ranked investors)
New Top 1% VC (4.40%)2,108Investor new to cap table; Dealroom global rank ≤ 400 (Top 1% of ~40,000 ranked investors)
New US investor (7.00%)2,108Investor new to cap table; investor headquartered in the United States
New international (non-European) VC (10.3%)2,108Investor new to cap table; investor headquartered outside Europe (includes US, Asia, other)
Cross-border investor reachSlush nBenchmark nNotes
European company with US investor (22.20% vs 4.50%)46910,177n = companies with this investor configuration; rate = n ÷ total population (Slush 2,108 · Benchmark 229,866); investor geography from Dealroom headquarters field
US company with European investor (37.00% vs 4.60%)508,580Restricted to US-domiciled companies only; Slush denominator is the ~135 US-domiciled companies in the ticket universe; benchmark denominator is Dealroom's global US company dataset (~185,800 companies), not the 229,866 European benchmark used elsewhere
Chart / metricSlush nBenchmark nNotes
Stage graduation, any transition (13.70% vs 5.40%)2,108229,866% that advanced at least one funding stage after first attendance; counted transitions: bootstrapped→seed, seed→early VC, early VC→growth/late; must occur post-event
Headcount growth (61.10% vs 49.40%)91030,952Restricted to companies with non-zero employee counts recorded in Dealroom at both the start and end of the observation window; measures net positive headcount change over that period
Grant / support-program received (23.80% vs 7.10%)2,108229,866At least one government grant, public program, or accelerator allocation recorded post-event; excludes VC equity rounds and debt; tracked separately to avoid conflating dilutive and non-dilutive capital
CohortSlush nBenchmark nNotes
2022360204,925Companies with no prior VC at first Slush attendance; graduated = first qualifying VC round post-event; quarters counted from 1 Nov 2022; benchmark is full bootstrapped pool anchored to Nov 2022
2023323204,925Same scope; quarters counted from 1 Nov 2023; benchmark anchored to Nov 2022 (calendar windows differ; see methodology caveat)
2024326204,925Same scope; quarters counted from 1 Nov 2024; benchmark anchored to Nov 2022 (calendar windows differ; see methodology caveat)
CohortSlush nBenchmark nNotes
2022418~21,309Companies at Seed or Angel stage at first Slush attendance; graduated = first Early VC or Series A round post-event; quarters counted from 1 Nov 2022; benchmark n back-calculated from quarterly rates
2023299~21,309Same scope; quarters counted from 1 Nov 2023; benchmark uses same pool anchored to Nov 2022
2024274~21,309Same scope; quarters counted from 1 Nov 2024; benchmark uses same pool anchored to Nov 2022
Match methodn% of universeNotes
Exact company name2,90464.5%Company name in Slush ticket data matches Dealroom name exactly (case-normalised)
Website domain47810.6%Domain extracted from Slush-supplied website field matched against Dealroom website field
Dealroom URL370.8%Slush ticket data contained an explicit Dealroom profile URL
Fuzzy name (confirmed)260.6%High-similarity fuzzy match, manually reviewed and confirmed
No match1,04423.2%No Dealroom record found; these companies are excluded from all benchmark comparisons
Filter stepRemaining nNotes
Paid-ticket universe (all years, EU + US)4,501Unique companies with paid tickets at Slush 2022, 2023, 2024, or 2025 · de-duplicated so each company appears once at earliest attendance
After Dealroom match3,45776.8% match rate · 1,044 companies could not be matched to a Dealroom profile and are excluded from all benchmark analysis
Europe-only filter~3,320Companies headquartered outside Europe (primarily US) removed · ~135 US-domiciled companies excluded; they appear separately in cross-border investor analysis
Founding year ≥ 2016~2,980Companies founded before 2016 excluded to ensure a comparable benchmark pool; older companies are over-represented in the matched European universe
Pre-Series B at first attendance~2,780Companies already at Series B or later stage at their first Slush attendance excluded; included in all other analyses but removed from stage-progression comparisons
2022–2024 cohorts only (exclude 2025)2,1082025 cohort excluded due to insufficient post-event observation window (~6 months); enters the analysis in the 2027 edition
CountrySlush nShare
Finland54425.8%
Germany34216.2%
United Kingdom28113.3%
Sweden21210.1%
Estonia1024.8%
Norway1004.7%
Netherlands733.5%
Switzerland602.8%
Denmark572.7%
France532.5%
Austria401.9%
Belgium331.6%
Italy321.5%
Lithuania271.3%
Spain261.2%
Other (23 countries)1266.0%
Stage at first Slush attendanceSlush nShareNotes
No prior VC (Bootstrapped)1,00947.9%No institutional VC round recorded before first attendance; point-in-time classification
Seed / Angel~630~29.9%At least one Seed or Angel round on record; no Early VC or later stage round yet
Early VC / Series A~416~19.7%At least one Early VC or Series A round on record at attendance
Series B+ (breakout)~53~2.5%Included in fundraising rate and investor quality analysis; excluded from graduation heatmaps
DatasetExtractedNotes
Dealroom company data (funding rounds, stage, geography, headcount)23 Apr 2025Full European company export; includes all round types and dates up to extraction date
Dealroom investor data (global rank, AUM, geography)6 May 2026Investor-level export used to construct power-law tier assignments; ~40,000 investors with a rank
Slush ticket data (attendance year, company name, website)Provided by SlushPaid-ticket records for 2022–2025 events; de-duplicated to first attendance year per company